I came across something recently that honestly stopped me in my tracks. It said that the whole idea of original sin comes from the story of Adam and Eve — and their so-called sin wasn’t murder or betrayal. It was knowledge. They ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, and for that, they were punished. Not just them, but everyone who came after.
When you really think about it, that’s wild. The greatest “crime” humanity ever committed was curiosity — the desire to know, to see, to understand. According to the story, we became mortal not because we disobeyed, but because we knew. Because we opened our eyes.
And that hit me hard. If knowledge was the original sin, then ignorance must have been the original obedience. What kind of god would want humans to stay unknowing? What kind of love depends on blindness to survive?
It’s unsettling because that same pattern still exists today. Religion still punishes curiosity. You’re told not to question, not to read beyond the approved books, not to think too much about the things that don’t quite add up. You’re warned that asking is dangerous — that too many questions will “lead you astray.” Yet everything we’ve ever learned as a species came from someone who refused to stay quiet.
And here’s the part that really makes me pause: in the story, the serpent actually told the truth. God said they’d die if they ate the fruit, but they didn’t. They just knew. Maybe the death wasn’t physical — maybe it was the death of blind innocence, replaced by awareness. And maybe that’s what power has always feared most: people who see.
So if the first humans were punished for knowing, maybe every act of learning since then is a quiet rebellion. Every time we question, every time we think for ourselves, every time we reach for truth instead of comfort — we take another bite of that fruit.
Maybe that’s not sin at all. Maybe that’s what it means to be fully, fiercely alive.